Sunday, 20 March 2016

yet again

It really is quite surprising where the protection of Anthony John Abbott comes from.

The latest may be a member of the party or someone associated with a member of the party working as registrar of the High Court in Sydney.

I wrote to him 3 times in the past few weeks asking fro normal registry assistance on lodging the High court proceedings against Abbott.  He refused to answer any email.  A while back he responded to my request for a simple how to for lodging after I had explained a couple of professors of constitutional law had looked over the case and said it was sound.  I got a few anonymous lawyers to look at it and again everything looks fine.  With Mr Grey of the Sydney Registry of the High court he suggested "get some legal advice" or talk to " your"  professors of law.

Canberra High Court registry have been very helpful.

Today I lodged the High Court documents at Brisbane registry for the High court.  It's a mail box for the High Court and instead of sending to Canberra as would be normal they faxed it to Mr Grey in Sydney.  In about 19 minutes he read the 25-30 pages and said he refused the lodgement because I don't comply with rule 27 of the High Court Rules.  There are 70 parts to rule 27.

Mr Grey refused to tell the Brisbane registry office which part of the rule wasn't complied with.

I rang the Sydney office a minute after the Brisbane office was speaking with Mr Grey and he "wasn't in the office".  The registry clerk I spoke to refused to tell me which part of the rule wasn't complied with.

Is Mr Grey or a member of his family a part of the liberal party?  I have asked the Canberra registry,assuming the emails get through to them and aren't hijacked by Mr Grey.  I have asked Mr Keenan as Minster of Justice but he is one of the Abbottistas and I doubt he will bother even thinking about replying.

Some other fine coverups for Mr Abbott are:-

Senator Brandis destroying my emails about a possible crime and not referring them to the Attorney General Department.  AFP have been advised but breath holding doesn't work.

Mr Quaedvlieg deciding he as 2IC at AFP couldn't investigate fraud where Mr Abbott signed false declarations for the AEC because the AEC couldn't ask about citizenship.

The petition to parliament,number 1108-2606 asking Mr Abbott to show parliament his renunciation of British citizenship papers.  That remains ignored by Mr Abbott.

The petition to parliament 1133-1639 asking if Mr Abbott's mum filling in his citizenship application was legal and within the Immigration department rules. That petition was lobbed onto Senator Cormann as Special Minister of State instead of Mr Dutton as Minister for Immigration. It is marked not referred.  Why on earth was it with Cormann and marked not referred?  It's Duttons department stupid.  And the Petitions committee dont respond to emails about that one.  Doc Jensen is the boss of that.

Peta Credlin telling me she would never allow an FOI about Abbott's renunciation papers before I had even written an FOI.

They are good,persistent and not even worried about being caught out.

So it comes to Mr Grey.  Are you a member of the party Mr Grey or is your wife? Perhaps mum and dad?

The lawyers in Queensland are terrified of being blacklisted by the party should their name ever be associated with the Abbott High Court trip. Who could blame them, the party has directors and owners of probably 30,000 companies in it's ranks and if they decide officially or unofficially to blacklist a lawyer that's a huge potential loss.  even without the actual blacklisting the threat of a possible blacklist terrifies the smallest individual all the way up to multi national companies.  One wanted to charge $800 to tell me there is a conflict of interest.


In case you didn't catch the gist of this, the High Court action has been knocked back by a possible member of the party because it doesn't comply with one bit of a 70 part rule of the high court.  Mr Grey registrar of Sydney High Court refuses to say which bit.


The bit down the bottom that paid for the printing,the photocopying,the envelopes and stamps and phone calls.  The trips to Brisbane and caffeine top ups from 5am until home time. the trips to Brisbane are a 6 hour round trip public transport adventure.

. 

Wednesday, 2 March 2016

Lodged in the Federal Court

I lodged the following with the federal court today.

It is now up to the court to see if the eyes are crossed and the tees dotted, hopefully all is well and then they will set a date for things to happen.

Federal Court rejected it,says its a High Court matter, so frantically learning high court legalese and lodging there.  Much more expensive LOL, even the number of copies of documents.  2 for court, 1 for Abbott, 1 for me and one each for every Attorney General in the land.  All states territories and Brandis.  fun fun fun in the sun


Tony Magrathea  
Applicant
Anthony John Abbott
Respondent


To the Respondent
The Applicant applies for the relief set out in this application.
The Court will hear this application, or make orders for the conduct of the proceeding, at the time and place stated below. If you or your lawyer do not attend, then the Court may make orders in your absence.
You must file a notice of address for service (Form 10) in the Registry before attending Court or taking any other steps in the proceeding.



Details of claim
On the grounds stated in the statement of claim, accompanying affidavit or other document prescribed by the Rules, the Applicant claims:
1.            I seek relief under the Common Informers (Parliamentary Disqualifications) Act 1975, part 3,1 a & b, being $200 per day Mr Abbott has sat in parliament as a dual national in breach of S44 of the Australian Constitution.  A copy of form 18 20 110801 is attached.

AND



Tony Magrathea
Applicant
Anthony John Abbott
Respondent
The applicant gives notice that the proceeding involves a matter arising under the Constitution or involving its interpretation within the meaning of section 78B of the Judiciary Act 1903.
Nature of Constitutional matter
The Common Informers (Parliamentary Disqualifications) Act 1975 3.1 states “Any person who, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, has sat as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives while he or she was a person declared by the Constitution to be incapable of so sitting shall be liable to pay to any person who sues for it in the High Court a sum equal to the total of:” Mr Abbott has failed to comply with that part of the constitution which requires him to be disqualified if he “is under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power;” Section 44, (i) of the Australian Constitution.
Facts showing that section 78B Judiciary Act 1903 applies
1.            Mr Abbott was born in London England on 11th November 1957 to a British father and Australian mother.  This gave him automatic British citizenship under the laws operating in the United Kingdom at that time. Document 1 is a copy of his British birth certificate.
2.            In June 1981 Mr Abbott gained Australian citizenship which was granted as per section 11(4) of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948. That states “The applicant, and any natural child of the applicant included in the application, becomes an Australian citizen on the day on which the applicant is registered as an Australian citizen”.  With this granting of citizenship Mr Abbott became a dual British and Australian citizen.  Document 2 is a copy of the National Archives of Australia file page detailing the granting of citizenship.
3.            In October 1981 Mr Abbott entered Oxford University which advised “Mr Abbott had British nationality when he matriculated on 17 October 1981. ie. When he was formally admitted to university”.  A copy of the FOI document is document 3.  This shows Mr Abbott was aware he had dual British and Australian citizenship when entering Oxford four months after gaining Australian citizenship.
4.            The Department of Prime Minster and Cabinet in an FOI 2014/159 states that the renunciation documents do not exist.  A copy of that decision is at document 4.
5.            On 4th February 2016 the National Archives of the UK sent me an email detailing that up until February 1986 Mr Abbott had not renounced his British citizenship.  A copy of that is at document 5.

6.            On 8th February 2016 I wrote to both Senator Brandis in his capacity as Attorney General and to the Secretary of the department of the Attorney General Mr Moraitis advising I may be commencing proceedings relating to the constitution and 78b of the Judiciary Act 1903. A copy of that letter addressed to Mr Moraitis is at document 6.  The same letter was sent to Senator Brandis.

7.            On 23rd November 2015 a petition was lodged in parliament to have Mr Abbott show his renunciation papers.   As of 29th February 2016 Mr Abbott has not responded to that petition.  The petition is number 1108-1606 and a copy is at document 7. 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ all the document mentioned above can be found in previous blogs 
or the FOI link mentioned so often   

The petition to parliament unanswered by Abbott is in the blog
The letter to Brandis and Moraitis is basically whats in the lodged documents for court. 
And the email from the National archives is in the blog 

The cost surprised me.  
  

And that bit at the end of everything,just for old times sake 






Monday, 15 February 2016

2 petitions one reply

In November these petitions were lodged at parliament house:-http://tonymagrathea.blogspot.com.au/2015/10/petitions-to-parliament.html


This reply was the only one given to the two petitions.

The reply refers to petition 1105-1603. Thats the petition asking who is responsible for monitoring and policing section 44 of the constitution.  No one is.

Petition 1108-1606 is the one asking for Abbott to show his renunciation papers.  The one that has been ignored.  Perhaps Mr Cormann thought I was thick as two bricks and wouldn't notice he hasn't answered that petition.

I wrote this to Mr Cormann as Special Minister of State


Dear senator

2 petitions were lodged in parliament on 23/11/15

You answered 1105/1603 and provided the same letter as an answer to 1108/1606

1108/1606 asked the parliament to demand Mr Abbott show he has renounced his British citizenship.  I take it from your lack of response to this petition that Mr Abbott has not renounced  His British.  As set out in that petition Mr Abbott was born British and became a dual citizen when he got Australian citizenship in june1981.
His refusal to provide the renunciatory papers will be used in court next month to prove he is in parliament illegally,.

It is simplicity itself to provide a copy of the renunciation papers when has renounced.  Mr Abbott didn't bother.

Will you refer the matter to the AFP  or will you wait for the court to do that?  As you know Mr Abbott has not renounced his British citizenship you may make yourself complicit in hiding his crime of fraud and become liable to prosecution under S44 of the Crimes Act, but that will be something for the AFP to determine.

Why do you conservatives do all you can to protect Abbott?  It even came down to someone hacking my gmail account in August 2014

Check the documentary proof, he entered Oxford university as a British citizen in October 1981, after getting Australian citizenship in June 1981.  A definite case of dual citizenship. 

Once Abbott has been found guilty how many conservatives will follow?  My intention was never to get someone into court, just to see the law obeyed.  Ms Credlin in her role as Chief of Staff wrote to me telling me if I ever lodged an FOI application to see the renunciation papers she would refuse the application.  The chief of staff of the prime minister becoming an FOI clerk to protect him. Thats the beginning of the search which has found he has been a criminal fraud for nearly 22 years and protected from prosecution by you.  You profited from the protection by your appointment as minister.   http://tonymagrathea.blogspot.com.au/2015/10/documentary-proof-for-petition-to.html this contains his British birth certificate, the Oxford FOI a link to his citizenship application submitted by his mother, not himself.

I take it not answering the petition was a deliberate attempt to hide his guilt? surely your staff  couldn't be that incompetent?   Or maybe just an honest mistake where the wrong letter was posted to the APH site?

Will you please send a copy of this to Mr Abbott, his APH contacts seem to have been turned off.





That bit at the bottom of my blogs where Fagin sings about picking pockets






Sunday, 14 February 2016

Mr Dreyfus please

Nice to see you ripping a new one for Stewie, getting the AFP to investigate is a start.

How about the one you all forgot? Abbott?
Petitions lodged in Parliament on 23/11/15 asked he show his renunciation of British citizenship papers.  

 To the Honourable the Speaker and the members of the House of Representatives.


This petition of a concerned citizen of Australia draws the attention of the house to concerns of many thousands of social media users with regard to Mr Abbott’s right to sit in parliament.  Mr Abbott was born in the UK to a British father and got automatic British citizenship under UK laws of that time.  In June 1981 Mr Abbott applied for and got Australian citizenship by descent from his Australian mother.  On October 17th 1981 he entered Oxford University as a British citizen.  Documentary proof in this web link http://tonymagrathea.blogspot.com.au/2015/10/documentary-proof-for-petition-to.html

There is no record in Australia or the UK of Mr Abbott having renounced his British citizenship.  Under section 44 of the Australian Constitution a member of parliament must not be under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power. Mr Abbott must have renounced his British citizenship by filling in a UK Home Office form RN and paying a fee.

I ask the House to instruct Mr Abbott to show he has renounced his British citizenship and complies with the constitution, failing that for the House to remove Mr Abbott from parliament.

Mr Brough, when he was Special Minister for State, had his staff ring me at home saying they would not be asking Mr Abbott to show his renunciation papers because that would incriminate Mr Abbott.

People are going to the courts next month to have Mr Abbott prove he is legitimate or a criminal because you politicians refuse to do so. Undoubtedly once Mr Abbott is shown to be a criminal fraud in court every other foreign born MP will be asked to prove it or lose it in the courts.   That would include the doubtful labour party senators Conroy and Cameron as well as former PM Gillard.

Please ask Mr Abbott in parliament to make sure the court action doesn't have to happen and every MP born overseas isn't taken to court where they would lose their Australian citizenship,be charged with fraud and lose all rights to pensions and probably have to repay all monies paid to them as MPs.

The proof of Mr Abbott is here:- http://tonymagrathea.blogspot.com.au/2016/01/plan-of-attack.html The British National Archives say there is a 30 year embargo on releasing details of renunciations.  As of Feb 1986 Mr Abbott and Ms Gillard had not renounced their British citizenship.  In 6 years time,30 years after Mr Abbott entered parliament will will have archive proof he is in parliament illegally. 

All MPs who protect Mr Abbott form police investigations or fail to report his crime of fraud risk being charged under S44 of the Crimes Act. Ironic that Mr Abbott is guilty of breaching S44 of the constitution and this is the 44th parliament.  even more so when 44 people voted for him when he was turfed from the leadership last year.

The number is up and that number is 44.  Please do the right thing and demand he answer the petition or check the facts and ask the AFP to prosecute.

Mr Quaedvlieg emailed me in August 2014, just before my gmail account was hacked and advised the AFP would not prosecute Mr Abbott on the flimsy grounds the AEC can not ask about constitutional matters.  Mr Q got a nice promotion shortly afterward.  Obviously not linked, just coincidence.




We have laws for everyone, not just the paupers.  Even the elite have to pull their heads in and obey.






The bit at the bottom asking for a donation, thanks to all of you who have clicked the button.




Monday, 8 February 2016

The Pommie PMs,did any renounce?

Australia has had a few foreign born Prime Ministers

Sir George Houston Reid, GCN,GCMG, KC born 25/2/1845 at Johnsone in Scotland

William Morris Hughes, CH, QC, born 25/9/1862 at Pimlico,London

Andrew Fisher, born 29/8/1862 at Crosshouse,Scotland

Joseph Cook, GCMG, born 7/12/1860 at Silverdale, England

Anthony John Abbott, born 4/11/1957 at London, England

Julia Eileen Gillard, born 29/9/1961 at Barry Wales.

The British brought in their Nationality and Citizenship Act in 1948 act so the first four would have been Pommies and Aussies as Prime Minister.  Or not, the Australian citizenship laws may have stopped a few from becoming even Australians.

Ms Gillard and Mr Abbott had to have filled out their form RN and paid a fee to the British Home Office to renounce their British citizenship and become legally entitles to enter parliament.

The UK Records Office has written to me saying until 1986 there is no record of Ms Gillard and Mr Abbott ever renouncing their British citizenship.

I have asked Ms Gillard to show her renunciation papers but she doesn't reply to my emails.  Same modus operandi of Mr Abbott so at first glance I would say she too was Prime Minister illegally. And there you have the reason the most aptly named parliamentarian TWATTS, aka Timmy, came out so strongly protecting Mr Abbott in The Age.

A thirty year time frame on the UK National Records Office will come as a shock for these two when their pensions are cancelled in 8 years for Mr Abbott and 10 years for Ms Gillard.

We have laws for everyone, not just the paupers.  Even the elite have to pull their heads in and obey.





The bit at the bottom asking for a donation, thanks to all of you who have clicked the button.