Monday, 15 February 2016

2 petitions one reply

In November these petitions were lodged at parliament house:-

This reply was the only one given to the two petitions.

The reply refers to petition 1105-1603. Thats the petition asking who is responsible for monitoring and policing section 44 of the constitution.  No one is.

Petition 1108-1606 is the one asking for Abbott to show his renunciation papers.  The one that has been ignored.  Perhaps Mr Cormann thought I was thick as two bricks and wouldn't notice he hasn't answered that petition.

I wrote this to Mr Cormann as Special Minister of State

Dear senator

2 petitions were lodged in parliament on 23/11/15

You answered 1105/1603 and provided the same letter as an answer to 1108/1606

1108/1606 asked the parliament to demand Mr Abbott show he has renounced his British citizenship.  I take it from your lack of response to this petition that Mr Abbott has not renounced  His British.  As set out in that petition Mr Abbott was born British and became a dual citizen when he got Australian citizenship in june1981.
His refusal to provide the renunciatory papers will be used in court next month to prove he is in parliament illegally,.

It is simplicity itself to provide a copy of the renunciation papers when has renounced.  Mr Abbott didn't bother.

Will you refer the matter to the AFP  or will you wait for the court to do that?  As you know Mr Abbott has not renounced his British citizenship you may make yourself complicit in hiding his crime of fraud and become liable to prosecution under S44 of the Crimes Act, but that will be something for the AFP to determine.

Why do you conservatives do all you can to protect Abbott?  It even came down to someone hacking my gmail account in August 2014

Check the documentary proof, he entered Oxford university as a British citizen in October 1981, after getting Australian citizenship in June 1981.  A definite case of dual citizenship. 

Once Abbott has been found guilty how many conservatives will follow?  My intention was never to get someone into court, just to see the law obeyed.  Ms Credlin in her role as Chief of Staff wrote to me telling me if I ever lodged an FOI application to see the renunciation papers she would refuse the application.  The chief of staff of the prime minister becoming an FOI clerk to protect him. Thats the beginning of the search which has found he has been a criminal fraud for nearly 22 years and protected from prosecution by you.  You profited from the protection by your appointment as minister. this contains his British birth certificate, the Oxford FOI a link to his citizenship application submitted by his mother, not himself.

I take it not answering the petition was a deliberate attempt to hide his guilt? surely your staff  couldn't be that incompetent?   Or maybe just an honest mistake where the wrong letter was posted to the APH site?

Will you please send a copy of this to Mr Abbott, his APH contacts seem to have been turned off.

That bit at the bottom of my blogs where Fagin sings about picking pockets

No comments:

Post a Comment