Hon Mr Pyne & Hone Mr Burke
You two are leaders of the house and the opposition equivalent.
You have a criminal in the house and I don't mean Brough.
This
letter has been sent to the Secretary in charge of commonwealth law at
the Attorney General's department. I have given up trying to write to
Senator Brandis because he refuses to reply and his love of Tony Abbott
seems to have no bounds.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~
Dear Mr Manning
You are A/g Deputy Secretary, Civil Justice and Legal Services Group and responsible for Constitutional law in this country.
When
I have written to the Attorney General and the Minister for Justice and
your Secretary Mr Moraitis and asked the following question:-
Who
is responsible for the monitoring, prosecution and policing of Section
44 of the Australian constitution I have received the following reply:-
The AEC does not monitor S44 of the constitution.
Because
of these inept and rather ridiculous answers a petition was lodged in
parliament on 23 November 2015 asking that exact same question. The
Special Minister of State, Mr Brough's office advised you are
responsible for monitoring, policing and prosecuting section 44 of the
constitution.
As such I bring to your attention a breach of S44 of the Australian Constitution.
Mr
Abbott was born in the UK to a British father giving him automatic
British citizenship. That is the way their law operates. A copy of his
British birth certificate is in this blog:-
That also includes a copy of an FOI from Oxford University showing Mr
Abbott used his British citizenship in October 1981 to enter the
university. There is also a copy of the file cover of his application
for Australian citizenship, the National Archives made the file secret
as I was looking at it in February 2014.
The citizenship act of that time says that citizenship by descent starts the day the minister approves
the person becoming an Australian citizen, not the day of birth.
For 24 years Mr Abbott was a British citizen and to get rid of that he needed to fill in a form RN and pay a fee to the UK Home Office.
His staff say he has never filled in a form to renounce his British citizenship. An FOI 2015/048 from the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet confirms he has not renounced his British citizenship. A copy is available on the departments FOI log or here.
For 24 years Mr Abbott was a British citizen and to get rid of that he needed to fill in a form RN and pay a fee to the UK Home Office.
His staff say he has never filled in a form to renounce his British citizenship. An FOI 2015/048 from the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet confirms he has not renounced his British citizenship. A copy is available on the departments FOI log or here.
The
British Home Office can neither confirm nor deny the renunciation paper
exist because to do so would be in contravention of their Data
Protection act, S29, which says no information can be released if it may
be used in criminal proceedings. The only way criminal proceedings
could happen is if Mr Abbott has not renounced and fraud charges are
pressed.
Mr
Abbott is still a British citizen and an Australian citizen and in
parliament illegally after signing 8 false declarations for the AEC.
Mr
Abbott has a law degree from one of the best law schools in the country
so has no excuse for not knowing what's going on with our law.
The
Australian Electoral Commission says they can not monitor or even ask
questions relating to S44 because the Constitution is not an Australian
commonwealth law. Similarly Roman Quaedvleig as 2IC in the Australian
Federal Police said they could not query breaches of S44 or even
consider fraud because the AEC is precluded from asking questions about
S44 of the constitution.
You Mr Manning, as A/g
Deputy Secretary, Civil Justice and Legal Services Group which monitors
Australia's Constitution is the person responsible for monitoring,
policing and prosecuting breaches of S44. You have information with you
in this email that shows Mr Abbott is n Breach of s44 and has lied
toot he AEC to enter parliament.
The petitions in parliament presented on 23 November 2015 require you to prosecute Mr Abbott.
I
do hope you fulfil your obligations under the Public Service Act, I am
an ex-public servant and know of the act and what is required of public
servants.
This matter has been messed around by
politicians for too long, our parliament now has a petition before it
demanding Mr Abbott show he is in parliament legitimately, his office
say he has not renounced his British citizenship and seem to gloat in
that fact.
I look forward to your advice that
you will investigate and prosecute a breach of the constitution. It is
scandalous that Senator Brandis and Mr Keenan chose political mateship
over the law.
I have just received copes of
Mr Abbotts Immigration file from the National Archives, he was granted
citizenship as per section 11 (4) of the Immigration act of that time which states:-
(4) The applicant, and any natural child of the applicant included in the application, becomes an Australian citizen on the day on which the applicant is registered as an Australian citizen.
The
file also shows Mr Abbott did not fill out the application for Birth By
Descent from an Australian mother which is in contravention of the
Immigration rules of the time, as an adult Mr Abbott must have filed out
the application himself and not his mother. He is not even an
Australian citizen. If you require copies of the NAA file, I don't
think I can send them to you under the release clauses used by the NAA,
but you will be able to easily sight them as part of AG's.(4) The applicant, and any natural child of the applicant included in the application, becomes an Australian citizen on the day on which the applicant is registered as an Australian citizen.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mr
Abbott didn't even bother to fill in his own application for
citizenship by descent, he let his mum do it for him. This is in
contravention of Immigration rules and Mr Dutton, another who refuses to
reply because of his love of Abbott, has been asked to revoke Mr
Abbott's citizenship. The law and simple form filling rules are there
for everyone and party membership shouldn't preclude anyone from
following the law and the rules.
Will you two
move to remove Mr Abbott from parliament house because he does not
comply with section 44 of the constitution. I feel pretty silly, for 2
years I was yelling he is a dual national, he may not even be
Australian.
Removing his Australian citizenship would not leave him stateless because he is still British.
I look forward to reading about your demanding the law be obeyed, merry christmas to you, your families and staff.
regardsThat bit at the end of my blog where I ask for pennies to pay for things like mail,phone calls,copies of citizenship papers etc etc
Thanks to those who do
No comments:
Post a Comment