A letter to Mr Heydon QC

Written to the clerk of  Eight Selborne Chambers, where Mr Heydon is a barrister.

Dear sir/madam

I have watched with interest your Mr Heydon QC in action at the Royal Commission into Trade Unions.  Might I ask if Mr Heydon believes the law should apply to everyone or are some exempt because of who they are?

I ask this because the person Mr Heydon spoke highly of to the Rhodes Trust and the same person who appointed Mr Heydon to the royal commission may in fact be avoiding or evading the law and protected by his many political friends from any investigation or prosecution.

Mr Abbott was born British, born in London to a British father made him automatically British.  He was given Australian citizenship by descent in June 1981 making him a dual citizen and entered Oxford University as a British citizen in October 1981.  Entering Oxford as a Briton may be in breach of Rhodes Trust rules.  I have asked the Trust to investigate but they have yet to get back to me.  The only possible reason for him doing that woudl be to claim British student allowances.  The Rhodes Trust are one of the ones reluctant to investigate Mr Abbott because to do so would put them in an extremely bad light.  As Mr Heydon recommended Mr Abbott to the trust, perhaps Mr Heydon would examine the case and ask the Rhodes Trust to do the same.

Mr Abbott's Australian citizenship by descent form not signed by him has been pointed out and asked to be investigated by Peter Dutton the Minister for Immigration in Australia. Again a political friend of Mr Abbott who seems reluctant to investigate and do anything about the possible breach of rules in applying for citizenship.  Mr Abbott did not actually fill out the application form his mother did.  This is in breach of the Immigration department rules that say an adult must make their own application.  He may lose his Australian citizenship and with that his Rhodes Scholarship and his parliamentary status.

The other problem with Mr Abbott is that if his citizenship is deemed OK, even with his mother filling in the form for him, he is a dual national and that is in breach of the Australian constitution.
He has signed 8 false declarations with the Australian Electoral Commission, but with the way the electoral act is written the AEC can not ask about breaches of the constitution and the Australian Federal Police can not ask about breaches of the constitution because the AEC is precluded form doing the same.

 
Letter to the Attorney Generals department, the actual AG Senator Brandis is protecting Abbott because they are old Oxford mates and refuses to comment on anything I send to him about Mr Abbott.

The citizenship file from the National Archives of Australia shows his mum signed the forms.  This link has the Immigration department rules for who fills in the form indicating a clear breach of rules and possibly laws.

This has the birth certificate & Oxford FOI telling he entered the university as a Briton,something which is possibly against Rhodes rules.  Mr Heydon as a scholar would know much more, again Rhodes Trust refuse to comment.

The petitions to parliament to find out about his breach of S44 of the constitution.  Mr Brough the Special Minister for State has refused to respond to the petitions because it would incriminate Mr Abbott.  Another political mate protecting him from the law, even refusing to investigate the possibility of criminality.

Mr Turnbull is the Prime Minister and this is the letter sent to him explaining Mr Abbotts criminality and asking he do something about it.  Again he has yet to reply to me.

This new petition was posted to Dr Jensen MP to be presented to parliament next year and hopefully will solve the problem of Mr Abbott not signing his own application for citizenship by descent form.

This letter was sent to the Rhodes Trust before finding out Mr Abbott's mother actually filled in his citizenship forms.

Would you please pass on this information to Mr Heydon and ask if he believes the law should apply to all?  His close association with Mr Abbott would tend to implicate him in Mr Abbotts problems, Mr Heydon was on the panel selecting Mr Abbott for the Rhodes scholarship, Mr Heydon is associated with the legal education of Mr Abbott and I am sure that the constitution and form filling were part of the curriculum.

Thank you for your time, a happy new year to all

Yours


And so endeth the lesson.  Now the bit at the end asking for a donation, I am a pauper.  Email is cheap and slow off the NBN and on it I guess, so if you can drop a penny or two in my cup.
Have a good one

Rhodes Statue at Oxford

The Independent ran a print version here:- http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/oxford-university-risks-damaging-its-standing-if-is-pulls-down-cecil-rhodes-statue-warns-tony-abbott-a6784536.html

Tony Abbott is complaining about the Rhodes Statue possibly being moved, that is laughable.

They should check the facts with the Rhodes Trust as to the propriety of calling Abbott a Rhodes Scholar.

I believe the trust is conducting an inquiry into Mr Abbott's Rhodes Scholarship application and his entering Oxford.

Mr Abbott was born British, born in London to a British father made him automatically British.  He was given Australian citizenship by descent in June 1981 making him a dual citizen and entered Oxford University as a British citizen in October 1981. 

Entering Oxford as a Briton may be in breach of Rhodes Trust rules.  I have asked the Trust to investigate but they have yet to get back to me.  The only possible reason for him doing that woudl be to claim British student allowances.

Mr Abbott's Australian citizenship by descent is currently being investigated by Peter Dutton the Minister for Immigration in Australia.  Mr Abbott did not actually fill out the application form his mother did.  This is in breach of the Immigration department rules that say an adult must make their own application.  He may lose his Australian citizenship and with that his Rhodes Scholarship and his parliamentary status.

The other problem with believing Mr Abbott is that if his citizenship is deemed OK, even with his mother filling in the form for him, he is a dual national and that is in breach of the Australian constitution.

He has signed 8 false declarations with the Australian Electoral Commission, but with the way the electoral act is written the AEC can not ask about breaches of the constitution and the Australian Federal Police can not ask about breaches of the constitution because the AEC is precluded form doing the same.

Rupert Murdoch owns the Australian government and most journalists in this country are desperate to get a job with NewsCorp so they refuse to consider running the story.

Check yourself.  These links will give you all the information you need and perhaps your asking Rhodes Trust what is going on with the inquiry you might be able to get answers that they refuse to provide to me.

Letter to the Attorney Generals department, the actual AG Senator Brandis is protecting Abbott because they are old Oxford mates

The citizenship file from the National Archives of Australia shows his mum signed the forms.  This link has the Immigration department rules for who fills in the form.

This has the birth certificate & Oxford FOI

The petitions to parliament to find out about his breach of S44 of the constitution.  Mr Brough the Special Minister for State has refused to respond to the petitions because it would incriminate Mr Abbott.  I have that phone call recorded, but as that may be illegal in Australia I cant give that to you.

Mr Turnbull is the Prime Minister and this is the letter sent to him explaining Mr Abbotts criminality and asking he do something about it.

This new petition was posted to Dr Jensen MP to be presented to parliament next year. 

This letter was sent to the Rhodes Trust before finding out Mr Abbott's mother actually filled in his citizenship forms.

The Rhodes statue should stay but not because a criminal fraud demanded it.

I do hope you can enjoy this over christmas, have a wonderful time

enjoy



Oliver or was it Fagan? Got to pick a pocket or two

petition about signing citizenship by descent forms

The boys being boys, how Abbott eats an onion and Warney showing him the way his mum taught him.  I doubt Warne's mum does it that way but as mum's are being blamed in this blog - why not.




A petition was sent to parliament asking clarification of Mr Abbott's Australian citizenship documents.  His mum filled them in.  It was presented to parliament 8 February 2016 marked "this petition was not referred".  It has been well and truly hidden from parliament,the people, the Minister for Immigration and even Mr Abbott.

You can see the  petition insitu with Senator Cormann's petition list in the Parliament House web pages.  1133-1639 is the petition number if you would rather google and see for yourself.

A favour to ask, would you please write to doc Jensen as chair of the petitions committee and ask when he became incompetent.  Doc Jensen is a very smart man, much respect for his intelligence but zero for his party politics.  The committee members have refused to send the petition to the Minister for Immigration Mr Dutton. Maybe you could ask your local MP to ask that the petition be referred to Mr Dutton?  The Petition Committee secretariat has no power to address this possibly criminal cover up.  It is a crime to cover up another person's crime under Section 44 of the Crimes Act.  The email address for the committee is petitions.committee.reps@aph.gov.au and for Doc Jensen the Chair of the petitions committee is Dennis.Jensen.MP@aph.gov.au

The Petition Secretariat, the public servants, have been told not to forward emails about this petition to the committee, instead demanding people write to the Petition committee directly.  Sadly the public servants are in the middle and need to cover their arses so all blame lies with the liars. (noice sentence Tony LOL)

An FOI about this same problem was lodged about a month before this petition was put to parliament.  Four or five months later I got an email saying they are sorry for the delay, they are trying to find an FOI officer.  FOIs must be answered within 30 days, this one is 4 months late.

Here is the wording of the petition, can you see why it might go to the Special Minister for State? Or why it was marked not to be referred?  Is that incompetence or a planned cover up. You decide.

This is the blog with the National Archives of Australia file.

To the Honourable the Speaker and the members of the House of Representatives.

This petition of a concerned citizen of Australia requests the House to determine if former Prime Minister Mr Abbott MP applied for Australian citizenship by descent properly and correctly with regards to all rules and laws governing the Immigration application procedures of the time.

Former Prime Minister Mr Abbott’s citizenship by descent application in the National Archives of Australia is signed by Fay Abbott, his mother.  Mrs Abbott got assisted passage, colloquially known as the ten pound pom boat trip in 1961 so there is a chance that she may have been British at the time of former Prime Minister Mr Abbott’s birth, her citizenship on returning to Australia is not clear, she may also have been a dual citizen.  Immigration rules of the time the citizenship by descent application was lodged say the mother may lodge an application for citizenship by descent for a child, but when that child reaches adulthood the child must fill in the form.  Former Prime Minister Mr Abbott was 23 at the time the form was filled in and did not sign anything in the National Archives file.

I beg the house to determine if the former Prime Minister Mr Abbott MP filled in his citizenship by descent forms correctly.

Principal petitioner:-

Tony Magrathea


In the written response from Doc Jensen he said this response would be for this petition.  It is a response used for the petition about S44, who monitors and controls it.  Doc Jensen is using this response for the four petitions I lodged, petitions about S44, about Abbott's renunciation of British citizenship, this about immigration forms and procedures and another asking for a full audit of renunciation of foreign citizenships because the one for Abbott has not been answered.

I guess Abbott refusing to respond to the petition about his renunciation papers is an admission of guilt.

Mr Duttons office said they would not comment on Mrs Abbott filling in the Immigration forms because it might implicate Mr Abbott in something illegal.  

Here is the catch all response to the Abbott petitions and S44 petitions.  

The response

 I know some in parliament are doing all they can to cover up Abbott's crimes, but this is ridiculous.  At least the trip to court next month will benefit from the cover-up and the refusal to answer could be implied as guilt and posterity will look back and determine if the members of the committee acted legally in covering up the criminality of Mr Abbott.

Those on the committee and those actively covering up Mr Abbott's fraud in signing false declarations for the AEC  should check out the Crimes Act S44.

Strange numbers coincidence

It's the 44th parliament
Mr Abbott is guilty of breaching S44 of the constitution
Those who cover up his crimes are risking S44 of the crimes act
And of course 44 voted for him in the spill when the silver bodgy won.
 
 And this on twitter, 57-7 Doc Jensen says that Mat Cormann the Special Minister of State now does immigration forms too.



  


The donation bit, thanks to everyone who has clicked and donated.  The money helps pay for Federal Court trips to Brisbane and ditto for High court.  The photocopying, the printing, the envelopes and stamps (yes they actually still exist) the phone calls. 

Thanks again.
 

Leaders of the House

Hon Mr Pyne & Hone Mr Burke

You two are leaders of the house and the opposition equivalent.

You have a criminal in the house and I don't mean Brough.

This letter has been sent to the Secretary in charge of commonwealth law at the Attorney General's department.  I have given up trying to write to Senator Brandis because he refuses to reply and his love of Tony Abbott seems to have no bounds.

Dear Mr Manning

You are A/g Deputy Secretary, Civil Justice and Legal Services Group and responsible for Constitutional law in this country.

When I have written to the Attorney General and the Minister for Justice and your Secretary Mr Moraitis and asked the following question:-

Who is responsible for the monitoring, prosecution and policing of Section 44 of the Australian constitution I have received the following reply:-

The AEC does not monitor S44 of the constitution.

Because of these inept and rather ridiculous answers a petition was lodged in parliament on 23 November 2015 asking that exact same question.  The Special Minister of State, Mr Brough's office advised you are responsible for monitoring, policing and prosecuting section 44 of the constitution.

As such I bring to your attention a breach of S44 of the Australian Constitution.

Mr Abbott was born in the UK to a British father giving him automatic British citizenship. That is the way their law operates.  A copy of his British birth certificate is in this blog:- That also includes a copy of an FOI from Oxford University showing Mr Abbott used his British citizenship in October 1981 to enter the university.  There is also a copy of the file cover of his application for Australian citizenship, the National Archives made the file secret as I was looking at it in February 2014.

The citizenship act of that time says that citizenship by descent starts the day the minister approves the person becoming an Australian citizen, not the day of birth. 

For 24 years Mr Abbott was a British citizen and to get rid of that he needed to fill in a form RN and pay a fee to the UK Home Office. 

His staff say he has never filled in a form to renounce his British citizenship.  An FOI 2015/048 from the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet confirms he has not renounced his British citizenship.  A copy is available on the departments FOI log or here.

The British Home Office can neither confirm nor deny the renunciation paper exist because to do so would be in contravention of their Data Protection act, S29, which says no information can be released if it may be used in criminal proceedings. The only way criminal proceedings could happen is if Mr Abbott has not renounced and fraud charges are pressed.

Mr Abbott is still a British citizen and an Australian citizen and in parliament illegally after signing 8 false declarations for the AEC. 

Mr Abbott has a law degree from one of the best law schools in the country so has no excuse for not knowing what's going on with our law.

The Australian Electoral Commission says they can not monitor or even ask questions relating to S44 because the Constitution is not an Australian commonwealth law.  Similarly Roman Quaedvleig as 2IC in the Australian Federal Police said they could not query breaches of S44 or even consider fraud because the AEC is precluded from asking questions about S44 of the constitution.

You Mr Manning, as A/g Deputy Secretary, Civil Justice and Legal Services Group which monitors Australia's Constitution is the person responsible for monitoring, policing and prosecuting breaches of S44.  You have information with you in this email that shows Mr Abbott is  n Breach of s44 and has lied toot he AEC to enter  parliament.

The petitions in parliament presented on 23 November 2015  require you to prosecute Mr Abbott.

I do hope you fulfil your obligations under the Public Service Act, I am an ex-public servant and know of the act and what is required of public servants.

This matter has been messed around by politicians for too long, our parliament now has a petition before it demanding Mr Abbott show he is in parliament legitimately, his office say he has not renounced his British citizenship and seem to gloat in that fact.

I look forward to your advice that you will investigate and prosecute a  breach of the constitution.  It is scandalous that Senator Brandis and Mr Keenan chose political mateship over the law.

I have just received copes of Mr Abbotts Immigration file from the National Archives, he was granted citizenship as per section 11 (4) of the Immigration act of that time which states:- 
(4)  The applicant, and any natural child of the applicant included in the application, becomes an Australian citizen on the day on which the applicant is registered as an Australian citizen.

The file also shows Mr Abbott did not fill out the application for Birth By Descent from an Australian mother which is in contravention of the Immigration rules of the time, as an adult Mr Abbott must have filed out the application himself and not his mother.  He is not even an Australian citizen.  If you require copies of the NAA file, I don't think I can send them to you under the release clauses used by the NAA, but you will be able to easily sight them as part of AG's.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mr Abbott didn't even bother to fill in his own application for citizenship by descent, he let his mum do it for him.  This is in contravention of Immigration rules and Mr Dutton, another who refuses to reply because of his love of Abbott, has been asked to revoke Mr Abbott's citizenship.  The law and simple form filling rules are there for everyone and party membership shouldn't preclude anyone from following the law and the rules.

Will you two move to remove Mr Abbott from parliament house because he does not comply with section 44 of the constitution.  I feel pretty silly, for 2 years I was yelling he is a dual national, he may not even be Australian.

Removing his Australian citizenship would not leave him stateless because he is still British.

I look forward to reading about your demanding the law be obeyed, merry christmas to you, your families and staff.

regards

That bit at the end of my blog where I ask for pennies to pay for things like mail,phone calls,copies of citizenship papers etc etc
Thanks to those who do

CDPP Abbotts citizenship file

scans of the National Archvies of Australia file for Tony Abbotts citizenship application

not even Australian

Dear Mr Manning

You are A/g Deputy Secretary, Civil Justice and Legal Services Group and responsible for Constitutional law in this country.

When I have written to the Attorney General and the Minister for Justice and your Secretary Mr Moraitis and asked the following question:-

Who is responsible for the monitoring, prosecution and policing of Section 44 of the Australian constitution I have received the following reply:-

The AEC does not monitor S44 of the constitution.

Because of these inept and rather ridiculous answers a petition was lodged in parliament on 23 November 2015 asking that exact same question.  The Special Minister of State, Mr Brough's office advised you are responsible for monitoring, policing and prosecuting section 44 of the constitution.

As such I bring to your attention a breach of S44 of the Australian Constitution.

Mr Abbott was born in the UK to a British father giving him automatic British citizenship. That is the way their law operates.  A copy of his British birth certificate is in this blog:- That also includes a copy of an FOI from Oxford University showing Mr Abbott used his British citizenship in October 1981 to enter the university.  There is also a copy of the file cover of his application for Australian citizenship, the National Archives made the file secret as I was looking at it in February 2014.

The citizenship act of that time says that citizenship by descent starts the day the minister approves the person becoming an Australian citizen, not the day of birth. 

For 24 years Mr Abbott was a British citizen and to get rid of that he needed to fill in a form RN and pay a fee to the UK Home Office. 

His staff say he has never filled in a form to renounce his British citizenship.  An FOI 2015/048 from the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet confirms he has not renounced his British citizenship.  A copy is available on the departments FOI log or here.

The British Home Office can neither confirm nor deny the renunciation paper exist because to do so would be in contravention of their Data Protection act, S29, which says no information can be released if it may be used in criminal proceedings. The only way criminal proceedings could happen is if Mr Abbott has not renounced and fraud charges are pressed.

Mr Abbott is still a British citizen and an Australian citizen and in parliament illegally after signing 8 false declarations for the AEC. 

Mr Abbott has a law degree from one of the best law schools in the country so has no excuse for not knowing what's going on with our law.

The Australian Electoral Commission says they can not monitor or even ask questions relating to S44 because the Constitution is not an Australian commonwealth law.  Similarly Roman Quaedvleig as 2IC in the Australian Federal Police said they could not query breaches of S44 or even consider fraud because the AEC is precluded from asking questions about S44 of the constitution.

You Mr Manning, as A/g Deputy Secretary, Civil Justice and Legal Services Group which monitors Australia's Constitution is the person responsible for monitoring, policing and prosecuting breaches of S44.  You have information with you in this email that shows Mr Abbott is  n Breach of s44 and has lied toot he AEC to enter  parliament.

The petitions in parliament presented on 23 November 2015  require you to prosecute Mr Abbott.

I do hope you fulfil your obligations under the Public Service Act, I am an ex-public servant and know of the act and what is required of public servants.

This matter has been messed around by politicians for too long, our parliament now has a petition before it demanding Mr Abbott show he is in parliament legitimately, his office say he has not renounced his British citizenship and seem to gloat in that fact.

I look forward to your advice that you will investigate and prosecute a  breach of the constitution.  It is scandalous that Senator Brandis and Mr Keenan chose political mateship over the law.

I have just received copes of Mr Abbotts Immigration file from the National Archives, he was granted citizenship as per section 11 (4) of the Immigration act of that time which states:- 
(4)  The applicant, and any natural child of the applicant included in the application, becomes an Australian citizen on the day on which the applicant is registered as an Australian citizen.

The file also shows Mr Abbott did not fill out the application for Birth By Descent from an Australian mother which is in contravention of the Immigration rules of the time, as an adult Mr Abbott must have filed out the application himself and not his mother.  He is not even an Australian citizen.  If you require copies of the NAA file, I don't think I can send them to you under the release clauses used by the NAA, but you will be able to easily sight them as part of AG's. 

yours sincerely


Tony Magrathea


and the bit down the bottom asking for spare pennies, thanks to all who did send. Made getting the NAA file a lot easier 

Another letter to Brough, SMOS

I have emailed you asking about the petitions presented in parliament on 23 November and given to the SMOS to action. I have rung 3 times and been told 3 times someone will get back to me. 


Why are you doing exactly what Senator Ronaldson did? 

Is its SMOS policy to ignore anyone who mentions S44 of the constitution? 

You have enough problems with the AFP investigating you over the Ashby affair, why do you risk more charges by covering up the crime of fraud? In Queensland it is a crime under out Crimes act with I think 7 years imprisonment,the LNP increased the severity of the punishment just a few years back.

Lying to the AEC by a potential MP that they comply with the constitution is very serious, but to do it 8 times over a 21 year period is extraordinary. Mr Abbott knew he was a dual citizen, he entered Oxford University as a British citizen 4 months after getting Australian citizenship by descent. The Australian citizenship by descent begins when the Minister, Ian Macphee at the time, signs the approval not from birth. 

Mr Abbott has a law degree from Sydney University, same place as Mr Turnbull so has no excuse for not understanding the law. 

A copy of Mr Abbott's British birth certificate is here along with the FOI from Oxford University and the file cover of his Australian citizenship application. The National Archives are reluctant to release the citizenship papers because of some legal impropriety they contain. Perhaps you can get a look at them or ask Mr Dutton? I have asked Mr Dutton but he refuses to respond to me. 

Why such a cover up of crimes committed to get into parliament? This is by far the most outrageous crime or series of crimes ever committed in the Westminster style of parliament. Nothing in the entire history of our parliamentary system comes close to what Mr Abbott has done and what you continue to cover up. 

Will you ask Mr Abbott to show proof of his British citizenship renunciation? He was born British and the only way he can get rid of the British is to fill in a form and pay a fee to the Home Office in London.

Will you allow the AEC or some other authority to monitor, police and prosecute breaches of S44 of the constitution? 

Your job, as Mr Turnbull pointed out in parliament, is to uphold the integrity of parliament and this government. Hiding a crime to protect a mate is not upholding the integrity of anything. 

I do look forward to your replying to my email or at least giving one of the phone calls promised by your staff. Even more I look forward to the Australian law being upheld by all and not just those of us who aren't politicians. 

The letter will be published as have all communications to you. 

Any response will also be published. 


yours 


 Tony Magrathea

that bit at the end of my blogs asking for pennies, thanks