Independent Australia doesn't do letters to the editor and most papers refuse to me because I write things they don't want to read
Dear editor
I
was a little preoccupied by the former Prime Minister being in
parliament as a dual national. As you and some of your readers know
dual nationals are not allowed in our federal parliament because section
44 of our Constitution says it can't happen.
Nothing
wrong with dual nationals, I am one and have survived the legal system
in Australia pretty well, so far. But a Prime Minister who forgot to
renounce his British citizenship is a little careless.
I'm
over it, more or less. The thing that now sticks in my craw is the way
the Labour party and Liberal party combine to protect the former PM
from any investigation. And if Labour won't use the Australian spelling
there is no way I will change.
Mr Griffin is a Labour
party honcho who took over as acting Chair of the Joint Standing
Committee on Electoral Matters during the over throw of the former PM.
He held a secret meeting of some members of the JSCEM on the 14th of
October to discuss my emails to members of the committee asking
specifically:
could you please tell me who is responsible for monitoring and policing S44 of the constitution.
The AEC say that the constitution isn't law and they do not monitor it.
The AFP say they can not prosecute breaches of S44 because the AEC can not ask about S44 of the constitution.
Senator Brandis doesn't do it because the only current breach is a member of his party.
So who monitors compliance and prosecutes breaches of S44 of the constitution
could you please tell me who is responsible for monitoring and policing S44 of the constitution.
The AEC say that the constitution isn't law and they do not monitor it.
The AFP say they can not prosecute breaches of S44 because the AEC can not ask about S44 of the constitution.
Senator Brandis doesn't do it because the only current breach is a member of his party.
So who monitors compliance and prosecutes breaches of S44 of the constitution
The
secret meeting decided they would not inquire into who monitors S44 of
the constitution. It's what they do, JSC Electoral Matters.
Why
is there a cover up about who monitors and prosecutes breaches of our
Constitution? Why is a part of our constitution only prosecuted for 40
days every three years? And then only in a very special way, within 40
days of an election being decided 2 voters from the seat of a suspected
member of parliament in breach of S44 of the constitution must fork out
$500 and go to the High Court to determine if the MP is in the
parliament legally.
Another funny bit that came out of
my asking questions was my gmail account being hacked last year shortly
after sending a few emails and receiving one reply. Everything went
and they even cleared the bin. No way for anyone to recover anything. I
had just asked Brandi,Bishop and Brough to find out if the former PM
complied with s44 of the constitution.
I had also
asked the AFP to look at prosecution for fraud, every potential MP has
to sign a declaration for the AEC saying they comply with amongst other
things, S44 of the constitution. I believe it was Roman Quaedvlieg as
2IC of the AFP who replied to me and said the AFP can not examine the
matter or prosecute for fraud because the AEC can not look at
citizenship compliance under S44.
Coincidence my email
got hacked, I can't say who did it because I just don't know. Mr
Quaedvlieg was promoted by the former PM to the Border Farce job.
Tony
No comments:
Post a Comment